Narrow track CPP head with bias cancellation

ABSTRACT

The problem of increased edge sensitivity associated with the reduction of the spacing between bias magnets in a CPP head has been solved by limiting the width of the bias cancellation layer and by adding an extra layer of insulation to ensure that current through the device flows only through its central area, thereby minimizing its edge reading sensitivity.

This is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No.10/706,838, filed on Nov. 12, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,134,184, which isherein incorporated by reference in its entirety, and assigned to acommon assignee.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to the general field of magnetic read heads withparticular reference to CPP heads in which the deleterious effects oflongitudinal bias stabilization have been minimized.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The principle governing the operation of most current magnetic readheads is the change of resistivity of certain materials in the presenceof a magnetic field (magneto-resistance or MR). Magneto-resistance canbe significantly increased by means of a structure known as a spin valveor SV. The resulting increase (known as Giant Magneto-Resistance or GMR)derives from the fact that electrons in a magnetized solid are subjectto significantly less scattering by the lattice when their ownmagnetization vectors (due to spin) are parallel (as opposed toanti-parallel) to the direction of magnetization of their environment.

The key elements of a spin valve are a low coercivity (free)ferromagnetic layer, a non-magnetic spacer layer, and a high coercivityferromagnetic layer. The latter is usually formed out of a softferromagnetic layer that is pinned magnetically by a nearby layer ofantiferromagnetic (AFM) material. This pinning effect can be attenuated,where necessary, by the insertion of an exchange dilution layer betweenthe two. Alternatively, a synthetic antiferromagnet (formed bysandwiching an antiferromagnetic coupling layer between two antiparallelferromagnetic layers) may be used to replace the ferromagnetic pinnedlayer.

When the free layer is exposed to an external magnetic field, thedirection of its magnetization is free to rotate according to thedirection of the external field. After the external field is removed,the magnetization of the free layer will stay at a direction, dictatedby the minimum energy state, which is determined by the crystalline andshape anisotropy, current field, coupling field and demagnetizationfield. If the direction of the pinned field is parallel to the freelayer, electrons passing between the free and pinned layers, suffer lessscattering. Thus, the resistance in this state is lower. If, however,the magnetization of the pinned layer is anti-parallel to that of thefree layer, electrons moving from one layer into the other will suffermore scattering so the resistance of the structure will increase. Thechange in resistance of a spin valve is typically 8-20%.

First generation GMR devices were designed so as to measure theresistance of the free layer for current flowing in the plane (CIP) ofthe film. However, as the quest for ever greater densities continues,devices that measure current flowing perpendicular to the plane (CPP)have begun to emerge. For devices depending on in-plane current, thesignal strength is diluted by parallel currents flowing through theother layers of the GMR stack, so these layers should have resistivitiesas high as possible while the resistance of the leads into and out ofthe device need not be particularly low. By contrast, in a CPP device,the resistivity of both the leads and the other GMR stack layersdominate and should be as low as possible.

Although the layers enumerated above are all that is needed to producethe GMR effect, additional problems remain. In particular, there arecertain noise effects associated with these structures. Magnetization ina layer can be irregular because of reversible breaking of magneticdomain walls, leading to the phenomenon of Barkhausen noise. Thesolution to this problem has been to provide a device structureconducive to ensuring that the free layer is a single domain so that thedomain configuration remains unperturbed after fabrication and undernormal operation. This is achieved in the manner schematicallyillustrated in FIG. 1. Seen there is GMR stack 11 that is flanked bypermanent (hard) magnets 12 a and 12 b that provide a stabilizinglongitudinal field to stop the free layer breaking up into multipledomains at its outer edges.

However, as track widths grow smaller, the spacing between magnets 12 aand 12 b grows less so their effect extends further and further into thefree layer which, in turn, brings about a reduction in signal strength.It has been shown that, for CIP heads, the signal sensitivity of a hardbiased head can be increased by adding magnetic bias cancellation layer.Such a signal increase can extend the application of hard bias to anarrower track reader. In this type of bias cancellation AFM layer 21,as illustrated in FIG. 2, overlays the free layer. The AFM is used togenerate an exchange field with opposite bias direction to cancel outthe bias field generated by magnets 11 a and 11 b. By adjusting theexchange field strength (through inclusion of an exchange dilution layeras discussed above), one can produce a sensor with more of the free(sensing) layer available and thus more signal.

FIG. 3 compares normalized signal strength as a function of transversefield in a CIP head. Curve 31, measured from a head withbias-cancellation shows higher sensitivity than that of curve 31 whichis for bias without cancellation

For CPP applications, the current flows perpendicular to the sensor asseen in FIG. 4. As was the case for a CIP, AFM layer 21 can generate anexchange field having opposite bias direction to cancel out the biasfield from hard magnets 12 a and 12 b. This enables the center portionof sensor 11 to have higher sensitivity and thus to produce a strongersignal when sensing current flows through the sensor. Also seen in FIG.4 are top and bottom contact layers, 42 and 41 respectively, as well asinsulating layer 43 that insulates the lower contact 41 from the magnets12 a and 12 b.

A routine search of the prior art was performed with the followingreferences of interest being found:

In U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,553, Stearns et al. disclose a sensor formed ofalternating magnetic and non-magnetic materials. U.S. Pat. No. 6,597,546(Gill) describes a tunnel junction sensor with AFM coupled flux guide.Coehoorn et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,577,124) show a sensor having FM layerswith different uniaxial anisotropies. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,529,353,Shimazawa shows a hard magnet used to apply bias to a sensor while Yuanet al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,739,987) disclose AFM layers providingtransverse biasing to a sensor.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It has been an object of at least one embodiment of the presentinvention to provide a CPP GMR device having good signal strength aswell as longitudinal stability.

Another object of at least one embodiment of the present invention hasbeen that said device have minimal side reading effects.

Still another object of at least one embodiment of the present inventionhas been that said device be capable of running at higher currents toincrease its signal but with minimal increasing in its side readingsensitivity.

A further object of at least one embodiment of the present invention hasbeen to provide a process for manufacturing said device.

These objects have been achieved by using an AFM layer as a biascancellation layer. Said bias cancellation layer does not extend all theway to the edges of the permanent magnets that supply longitudinal bias,but terminate short distances therefrom. A layer of insulation ensuresthat current through the device flows only through its central area,thereby minimizing its edge reading sensitivity.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a GMR stack flanked by twopermanent magnets that provide longitudinal stabilization.

FIG. 2 is FIG. 1 with the addition of a bias cancellation layer toimprove signal output.

FIG. 3 plots normalized signal output as a function of the transversefield in a CIP head.

FIG. 4 is a more detailed depiction of FIG. 2.

FIG. 5 shows the device of the present invention coupled with a plot ofthe bias field as a function of off-track position.

FIG. 6 is a plot of the normalized signal as a function the strength ofthe bias cancellation field.

FIG. 7 shows an early stage in the process of the present invention.

FIG. 8 shows placing a liftoff mask on the bias cancellation layerbetween the hard magnets.

FIG. 9 shows the deposition of an additional insulating layer, followedby liftoff.

FIG. 10 shows the completed device.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention discloses a CPP design with bias cancellationwhose signal current has been constrained to flow through only the areawhere bias cancellation is taking place. This is accomplished throughthe introduction of two novel modifications to the prior art design thatwas shown in FIG. 4. As illustrated in FIG. 5, these are a reduction inthe width of the bias cancellation layer (now seen as AFM layer 52) andthe introduction of additional insulating layer 51 which serves to limitcurrent flow to be through only the area that has bias cancellation.

Continuing our reference to FIG. 5, in the top half of that figure wehave plotted the bias field as a function of position relative to thecenter of the read track. Curve 55 shows the hard bias field, curve 56the hard bias cancellation field, and curve 57 the total field.

Referring now to FIG. 6, using data obtained through micro-magneticsimulation we have plotted the normalized signal amplitude as a functionof the hard bias cancellation field. This shows that the signalamplitude of this new structure increases almost linearly with the hardbias cancellation field strength.

Referring next to FIG. 7 we now begin a description of the process formanufacturing the new device. The process begins with the provision of asubstrate (not shown) on which lower lead layer 41 is formed. Therequisite layers to form a GMR stack are then laid down followed by anexchange dilution layer of, but not limited to, Cu, Ru, Cr, Rh, Ta, orlaminates of two or more of these elements which is deposited to athickness between about 5 and 20 Angstroms and an AFM, biascancellation, layer of (but not limited to) IrMn, NiMn, PtMn, FeMn, orPdPtMn which is deposited to a thickness between about 30 and 150Angstroms.

Then, stack, dilution layer, and AFM layer are patterned to form GMRstack 11, exchange dilution layer 71 and bias cancellation layer 21. Asshown in the figure, GMR stack 11 has sloping sidewalls to allow goodcontact with dielectric layer 43 which is deposited next. This isfollowed by the deposition and patterning of a hard magnetic layer toform bias magnets 12 a and 12 b of, but not limited to, CoCrPt, CoCr,CoCrTa, CoCrPtTa, or CoCrNi.

After they have been magnetized, there is a magnetic field of betweenabout 500 and 2,000 Oe at the inner edge of each hard magnetic layer andof between about 50 and 500 Oe at a point midway between these inneredges.

Moving on to FIG. 8, liftoff mask 81 is then formed so that it covers acentrally located reduced length of bias cancellation layer 21 (betweenabout 0.01 and 0.2 microns long) and leaves uncovered portions of 21that extend inwards a distance from the inside edges of longitudinalbias hard magnetic layers 12 a and 12 b. Said distance is typicallybetween about 0.01 and 0.2 microns.

Then, as shown in FIG. 9, second dielectric layer 91 is deposited on allexposed surfaces, following which mask 81 is lifted off, therebyexposing reduced length bias cancellation layer 21. Formation of thestructure is completed with the deposition of top lead layer 42 on allexposed surfaces. The resulting GMR device has a signal strength thathas increased by between about 10 and 100%.

In addition to the larger signal output provided by the read head of thepresent invention, it offers several other advantages:

-   1. Easy alignment: The addition of a second insulating layer (layer    51) with a centrally located opening in which the bias cancellation    layer sits, makes alignment of the latter with respect to the GMR    stack much easier.-   2. Suppression of side-reading due to flux propagation: The    continuity of the free layer will force the bias-cancellation    portion to have coherent rotation when the edge region is exposed to    a side track flux. The full strength field from the hard bias    magnets along the edge portion can effectively suppress the edge    region magnetization rotation.-   3. Less current shunting: Sensor sensitivity at its edges is much    reduced. Since current is now constrained to not flow through the    edge portion, edge shunting effects are minimized.-   4. Less instability induced by current: This design uses the center    portion of the free layer as the sensor. The current induced    circular field effects to edge portions will have less impact on the    output signal, which will allow the CPP device to pump more current    in order to get more signal.-   5. Suppression of side-reading due to current spreading: Because    current is constrained to not flow through the edge portion.-   6. Reducing edge scattering effects: The magnetic edge is separated    from the physical edge. The CPP GMR degradation due to lateral edge    scattering can thus be reduced even for small size CPP devices.-   7. Reducing the impact of process variations: This is because the    magnetic active area is away from the physical edge region.

1. A GMR stack having sidewalls and an upper surface, comprising: inaddition to the GMR stack itself, opposing hard magnetic layers that lieon said sidewalls and are separated by a gap; on said upper surface insaid gap, a bias cancellation layer having two opposing ends, each ofwhich has a removed portion whereby each of said opposing endsterminates a finite distance from one of said hard magnetic layers; andsaid hard magnetic layers and removed portions being covering with alayer of insulation whereby current through said GMR stack isconstrained to flow through its central area.
 2. The GMR stack describedin claim 1 wherein said bias cancellation layer further comprises anantiferromagnetic layer on an exchange dilution layer that serves toreduce exchange coupling between said antiferromagnetic layer and saidGMR stack.
 3. The GMR stack described in claim 1 wherein each distancefrom one of said hard magnetic layers is between about 0.01 and 0.2microns.
 4. The GMR stack described in claim 1 wherein said hardmagnetic layer is selected from the group consisting of CoCrPt, CoOr,CoOrTa, CoCrPtTa, and CoOrNi.
 5. The GMR stack described in claim 1wherein said bias cancellation layer has a thickness between about 30and 150 Angstroms.
 6. The GMR stack described in claim 1 wherein saidGMR stack has a signal strength whose magnitude changes by between about1 and 20% whenever a free layer of said GMR stack reverses magnetizationdirection.
 7. A CPP magnetic read head, comprising: a substrate andforming thereon a lower lead layer; a GMR stack, having a first topsurface and sloping sidewalls, on said lower lead layer; anantiferromagnetic layer on an exchange dilution layer which is on saidfirst top surface and, said exchange dilution layer and saidantiferromagnetic layer together constituting a bias cancellation layerhaving a second top surface; a first dielectric layer on said lower leadlayer and on said sidewalls; opposing hard magnetic layers, separated bya gap, on only said first dielectric layer; said bias cancellation layerhaving two opposing ends, each of which terminates a finite distancefrom one of said opposing hard magnetic layers; a second dielectriclayer on only said hard magnetic layers and on those portions of saidfirst top surface not contacting said bias cancellation layer; and anupper lead layer on said bias cancellation layer and said seconddielectric layer.
 8. The magnetic read head described in claim 7 whereinsaid antiferromagnetic layer is selected from the group consisting oflrMn, NiMn, PtMn, FeMn, and PdPtMn.
 9. The magnetic read head describedin claim 7 wherein said exchange dilution layer is selected from thegroup consisting of Cu, Ru, Ta, Rh, and laminates thereof.
 10. Themagnetic read head described in claim 7 wherein said exchange dilutionlayer has a thickness between about 5 and 20 Angstroms.
 11. The magneticread head described in claim 7 wherein said opposing ends of the biascancellation layer are between about 0.01 and 0.2 microns apart.
 12. Themagnetic read head described in claim 7 wherein there is a magneticfield of between about 500 and 2,000 Oe at an inner edge of said hardmagnetic layer and between about 50 and 200 Oe midway between said inneredges.
 13. The magnetic read head described in claim 7 wherein saiddistance from one of said opposing hard magnetic layers is between about0.01 and 0.2 microns.
 14. The magnetic read head described in claim 7wherein said hard magnetic layer is selected from the group consistingof CoCrPt, CoCr, CoCrTa, CoCrPtTa, and CoCrNi.
 15. The magnetic readhead described in claim 7 wherein said bias cancellation layer has athickness between about 30 and 150 Angstroms.
 16. The magnetic read headdescribed in claim 7 wherein said read head has a signal strength ofbetween about 10 and 100% greater than similar devices of the prior art.